Create, edit and publish, then run your website and your app from their own dashboard. Every feature shown in real screenshots.
See the features
A Next.js project in React and TypeScript, sent to your GitHub repository. A spec change made in the repository comes back to Eqlo.
See the developer page
Paste a URL. In thirty seconds you see exactly what Google receives before any JavaScript runs.
Check a URLA ticket argued over for weeks usually gets settled by fatigue. Eqlo is an AI prototyping tool for product managers: you paste the ticket and its acceptance criteria, and a clickable prototype appears within minutes. Five users then test it through a private link, and no engineer has to stop what they are doing.
Fifteen comments, three readings of the need, and two disagreements nobody quite voices. The thread grows longer at every prioritization meeting. Putting a screen in front of people ends in one session a debate that text keeps alive for weeks.
"The customer can see where their order is." Support, design and engineering each picture a different screen. The gap shows up at acceptance, after the build has been paid for. When everyone has clicked through the same prototype, the gap shows up on day one.
Sales meets the new feature at the demo, support on release day. Their feedback arrives when nothing can change anymore. A link sent early in the cycle brings that feedback in while it can still shape the work.
The times below are rough estimates for a reasonable scope. No step goes through the engineering team.
Paste the ticket text, or attach its export as a text file: the AI reads txt, md, csv and json files. The "Improve my request" button rewrites the request without inventing anything and leaves [brackets] wherever the ticket is silent. Those brackets often point straight at the real gaps in the spec. Once the first version is ready, you refine it by typing.
You swap the sample data for your own by importing a CSV or Excel file into the project tables. You ask for the states that were missed: an empty list, an input error, a canceled order. After each generation, a report marks every requested feature as done, to configure, or not possible yet.
The approved flow becomes the team reference. Each acceptance criterion maps to a screen everyone has seen, and acceptance compares the shipped product to that screen. The conversation is about what appears on screen, not about what a sentence meant.
Until someone has used it, a prototype is just an opinion with a nice layout. Testing it takes no lab and no budget. You need five people, half an hour with each, and the discipline to stay out of the way.
Why five. The first sessions reveal most of the blockers, and later ones confirm them without adding much. Past that point, each session costs the same and teaches less. If your users fall into two very different groups, plan five sessions per group.
What to ask. Give a mission, not a request for opinions. "Find last week's order and tell me when it will arrive" teaches far more than "do you like this screen". People stay polite about opinions. Faced with a mission, they show you what gets in their way.
How to behave. Stay quiet, even while the person is searching. If you have to explain a screen, that is already a finding. Write down the hesitations, the missed clicks, and the moment they ask for help.
How to wrap up. A blocker seen once is an anecdote; seen three times, it is a problem to fix. Testers pin their comments to the section in question, and you send those comments to the AI one at a time or all at once. The next round is ready within the hour.
A made-up scenario for illustration. A product manager picks up ticket PRD-482, "order tracking area". It has sat in the backlog for two quarters, five people have commented on it, and each of them sees a different feature in it.
On Tuesday morning, she pastes the ticket into Eqlo, and the tracking screen exists before lunch. On Wednesday, she sends the review link to the three colleagues most active in the thread. Within ten minutes, two interpretations fall away, because the screen shows what the text left vague.
On Thursday, five customers take the test. Four of them look for tracking in the confirmation email and never in the app. The need changes shape before the first line of code, and the team commits the quarter to the right piece of work.
The text of ticket PRD-482 goes into the request box. Eqlo turns it into a tracking screen with three order statuses and a button to track the package.
The goal is not to add a tool to your day but to take steps out of it. Here is what stops being necessary once the screen comes before development.
| The old step | What replaces it |
|---|---|
| The twenty-page spec | a clickable prototype, with the acceptance criteria attached |
| The alignment meeting that goes in circles | half an hour clicking through the same screen together |
| The annotated static mockup | a review link with pinned comments |
| Acceptance argued line by line | a side-by-side check against the approved screen |
| Support briefed on release day | the same link, sent with the first version |
Some steps stay, and that is a good thing: choosing the scope, ordering priorities, and the feasibility conversation with engineering. The prototype gives them something concrete to work from without making them pointless.
The ticket never leaves your tracking tool. You copy its text into Eqlo, then paste the prototype link back into the ticket. History and comments stay where they were.
Give the address of your live app or a screenshot: Eqlo picks up its look and feel, meaning the colors, fonts and corner shapes. The Design tab then fine-tunes each setting. Testers react to the flow, not to a style that looks like nothing they know.
Backlog refinement, sprint review, prioritization committee: the calendar does not move. Only the material changes, since you put a clickable screen on the wall instead of a document.
Exploring, testing and deciding need no outside help. That is where a product manager adds the most, and it is also where every back-and-forth with developers wastes the most time for everyone.
Once the flow is approved, Eqlo sends the project to your GitHub repository: the specification alongside the full Next.js, React and TypeScript source. Table data exports as CSV or SQL. Your developers start from the sequence of screens, and rewrite the business logic and access rights their own way.
Pick your next read according to where your product stands.
The prototyping page covers the tool itself and its settings. This one follows a product manager's work, from the backlog ticket to acceptance, through alignment and testing.
No. Everything happens by typing sentences and clicking in the preview. The skill that matters lies elsewhere: describing a flow precisely, then staying silent during tests. Two or three tries are enough to get the hang of it.
If the request is twelve words or fewer and the goal is unclear, Eqlo asks up to three multiple-choice questions before generating. For a longer ticket, "Improve my request" flags the missing information in brackets.
No. They open a private review link, on a phone through its QR code if they prefer. Testers only enter their first name before commenting. After the session you can renew the link, which stops the old one from working, or delete it.
Yes. Every project has its own tables, filled through a CSV or Excel import of up to 20,000 rows. A table full of real cases draws feedback that a list of three examples never triggers.
Each edit is saved as a version that names its author and lists the changes. You compare two versions side by side, and restore the earlier one if the latest round of testing went worse.
That often happens with an internal tool, which then stays in Eqlo with its admin and its roles. For a product sold to customers, a members area and paid subscriptions can be added on request, and the SaaS MVP page covers that stage.
The Free plan includes five projects, no card required. The review link opens with nothing more than a first name.